Diagnostic performance of a device for acoustic heart sound analysis in patients with suspected myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: As only a small proportion of patients with chest pain suffers from myocardial infarction (MI), safe rule-out of MI is of immense importance. Recently an ultrasensitive microphone performing diastolic heart sound analysis (CADScorSystem) for rule-out of coronary artery disease (CAD) has emerged. In this explorational study, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of the CADScorSystem for diagnosis of MI in the setting of a large emergency department. METHODS: Patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected MI were included. Acoustic heart sound analysis was performed in all patients and automated CAD-score values were calculated via a device-embedded algorithm, which also requires inclusion of three clinical variables: age, sex and presence of hypertension. Patients additionally received serial high-sensitive troponin T measurement measurements to assess the final diagnosis according to third Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction applying the European Society of Cardiology 0 hour/3 hours algorithm. Diagnostic parameters for MI, considering different CAD-score cut-offs, were computed. RESULTS: Of 167 patients, CAD-scores were available in 61.1%. A total of eight patients were diagnosed with MI. At a cut-off value of <20, CAD-score had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 90.7 (78.4-96.3). The corresponding positive predictive value (PPV) was 6.8 (2.7-16.2). For the adjusted CAD-score (age, sex, hypertension), at a cut-off value of <20, NPV was 90.0 (59.6-99.5) with a PPV of 10.8 (5.3-20.6). CONCLUSION: In this explorative analysis, a transcutaneous ultrasensitive microphone for heart sound analysis resulted in a high NPV analogous to the findings in rule-out of stable CAD in elective patients yet inferior to serial high-sensitivity cardiac troponin measurements and does not seem feasible for application in an emergency setting for rule-out of MI. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02355457.

Adverse events while awaiting myocardial revascularization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the current study was to estimate adverse event rates while awaiting myocardial revascularization and review criteria for prioritizing patients. METHODS: A PubMed search was performed on 19 January 2015, to identify English-language, original, observational studies reporting adverse events while awaiting coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Rates of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and emergency revascularization were calculated as occurrence rates per 1000 patient-weeks and pooled using random-effects models. RESULTS: The search yielded 1323 articles, of which 22 were included with 66 410 patients and 607 675 patient-weeks on the wait list. When awaiting CABG, rates per 1000 patient-weeks were 1.1 [95% confidence interval 0.9-1.3] for death, 1.0 [0.6-1.6] for non-fatal MI and 1.8 [0.8-4.1] for emergency revascularization. Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent outcomes, and sensitivity analyses demonstrated comparable event rates with low heterogeneity. Higher urgency of revascularization was based primarily on angiographic complexity, angina severity, left ventricular dysfunction and symptoms on stress testing, and such patients with a semi-urgent status had a higher risk of death than patients awaiting elective revascularization (risk ratio at least 2.8). Individual studies identified angina severity and left ventricular dysfunction as most important predictors of death when awaiting CABG. Adverse rates per 1000 patient-weeks for patients awaiting PCI were 0.1 [95% confidence interval 0.0-0.4] for death, 0.4 [0.1-1.2] for non-fatal MI and 0.7 [0.4-1.4] for emergency revascularization but were based on only a few old studies. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of death, non-fatal MI and emergency revascularization when awaiting myocardial revascularization are infrequent but higher in specific patients. Countries that not yet have treatment recommendations related to waiting times should consider introducing a maximum to limit adverse events, particularly when awaiting CABG.

SYNTAX score-0 patients: risk stratification in nonobstructive coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: The complexity of coronary artery disease (CAD) is a predictor of cardiovascular events in patients with >50 % diameter stenosis as determined by SYNTAX score. Here, we compare the Gensini score to SYNTAX in patients with CAD as well as apply the Gensini score in patients with nonobstructive CAD (NOB-CAD), defined by ≤50 % diameter stenosis, were the SYNTAX score cannot be utilized to define future risk. METHODS: The AtheroGene study enrolled 2316 patients [861/37.2 % with acute cardiovascular syndrome (ACS) and 1500/62.8 % with stable CAD (SCAD)]. Of these, 1966 had obstructive CAD (OB-CAD) with SYNTAX and Gensini scores available and 291 events with either cardiovascular mortality or non-fatal myocardial infarction were recorded. Furthermore, 350 patients had NOB-CAD with only Gensini score and 36 events. Median follow-up time was 4.9 years. RESULTS: In the OB-CAD cohort the SYNTAX and the Gensini score predicted outcome. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis with the dichotomized Gensini score showed a significant result (p = 0.04) in the NOB-CAD cohort. Cox Regression analysis after adjustment showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.33 and p = 0.04 for the Gensini score in the NOB-CAD cohort. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis provided the highest area under the curve (AUC) regarding the outcome for the Gensini score with 0.65 (p = 0.004). Comparing the SYNTAX and Gensini score in this cohort showed improved discrimination of patients with events by the Gensini score (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The Gensini score predicted events in patients with ≤50 % diameter lesions. Utilization of this score is useful to define risk in NOB-CAD patients.

Revascularisation versus medical treatment in patients with stable coronary artery disease: network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether revascularisation improves prognosis compared with medical treatment among patients with stable coronary artery disease. DESIGN: Bayesian network meta-analyses to combine direct within trial comparisons between treatments with indirect evidence from other trials while maintaining randomisation. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: A strategy of initial medical treatment compared with revascularisation by coronary artery bypass grafting or Food and Drug Administration approved techniques for percutaneous revascularization: balloon angioplasty, bare metal stent, early generation paclitaxel eluting stent, sirolimus eluting stent, and zotarolimus eluting (Endeavor) stent, and new generation everolimus eluting stent, and zotarolimus eluting (Resolute) stent among patients with stable coronary artery disease. DATA SOURCES: Medline and Embase from 1980 to 2013 for randomised trials comparing medical treatment with revascularisation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: All cause mortality. RESULTS: 100 trials in 93,553 patients with 262,090 patient years of follow-up were included. Coronary artery bypass grafting was associated with a survival benefit (rate ratio 0.80, 95% credibility interval 0.70 to 0.91) compared with medical treatment. New generation drug eluting stents (everolimus: 0.75, 0.59 to 0.96; zotarolimus (Resolute): 0.65, 0.42 to 1.00) but not balloon angioplasty (0.85, 0.68 to 1.04), bare metal stents (0.92, 0.79 to 1.05), or early generation drug eluting stents (paclitaxel: 0.92, 0.75 to 1.12; sirolimus: 0.91, 0.75 to 1.10; zotarolimus (Endeavor): 0.88, 0.69 to 1.10) were associated with improved survival compared with medical treatment. Coronary artery bypass grafting reduced the risk of myocardial infarction compared with medical treatment (0.79, 0.63 to 0.99), and everolimus eluting stents showed a trend towards a reduced risk of myocardial infarction (0.75, 0.55 to 1.01). The risk of subsequent revascularisation was noticeably reduced by coronary artery bypass grafting (0.16, 0.13 to 0.20) followed by new generation drug eluting stents (zotarolimus (Resolute): 0.26, 0.17 to 0.40; everolimus: 0.27, 0.21 to 0.35), early generation drug eluting stents (zotarolimus (Endeavor): 0.37, 0.28 to 0.50; sirolimus: 0.29, 0.24 to 0.36; paclitaxel: 0.44, 0.35 to 0.54), and bare metal stents (0.69, 0.59 to 0.81) compared with medical treatment. CONCLUSION: Among patients with stable coronary artery disease, coronary artery bypass grafting reduces the risk of death, myocardial infarction, and subsequent revascularisation compared with medical treatment. All stent based coronary revascularisation technologies reduce the need for revascularisation to a variable degree. Our results provide evidence for improved survival with new generation drug eluting stents but no other percutaneous revascularisation technology compared with medical treatment.

Usefulness of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor to predict repeat myocardial infarction and mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous intervention.

The plasma level of the inflammatory biomarker soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in healthy subjects. The prognostic capability of suPAR, its temporal course, and its relation to plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous intervention (PCI) is unknown. Therefore, the plasma suPAR and CRP levels were measured in 296 consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction admitted for primary PCI at baseline and every 6 to 8 hours thereafter until the cardiac biomarker levels had peaked. The end points were all-cause mortality and fatal or nonfatal recurrent myocardial infarction (MI). During a median follow-up period of 5.75 years, 69 deaths and 48 nonfatal and 14 fatal recurrent MIs occurred. All-cause mortality increased significantly from 8.1% to 41.5% across increasing quartiles of suPAR levels at the end of follow-up (log-rank p <0.0001). After adjustment for other independent prognostic factors, a highly significant increase was seen in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.45, 95% confidence interval, 1.19 to 1.76; p <0.001) and recurrent MI (hazard ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 2.01; p <0.01) for each standard deviation increment of suPAR levels). In contrast to plasma CRP, the suPAR levels remained stable after primary PCI. Furthermore, CRP did not predict mortality or reinfarction after adjustment for age and gender (p = 0.34). In conclusion, suPAR is a stable plasma biomarker after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary PCI that predicts all-cause mortality and recurrent MI.

Influence of ST-segment recovery on infarct size and ejection fraction in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with fibrinolytics, electrocardiogram-derived measures of ST-segment recovery guide therapy decisions and predict infarct size. The comprehension of these relationships in patients undergoing mechanical reperfusion is limited. We studied 144 patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. We aimed to define the association between infarct size as determined by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and different metrics of ST-segment recovery. Electrocardiograms were assessed at baseline and 90 minutes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Three methods for calculating and categorizing ST-segment recovery were used: (1) summed ST-segment deviation (STD) resolution analyzed in 3 categories (> or = 70%, > or = 30% to <70%, and <30%); (2) single-lead STD resolution analyzed in the same 3 categories; (3) worst-lead residual STD analyzed in 3 categories (<1 mm, 1 to <2 mm, and > or = 2 mm). Infarct size and ejection fraction were assessed at 4 months by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. All 3 ST-segment recovery algorithms predicted the final infarct size and cardiac function. Worst-lead residual STD performed the same as, or better than, the more complex methods and identified large subgroups at either end of the risk spectrum (median infarct size from the lowest to highest risk category (percentage of left ventricle: 7.7% [interquartile range 10.8], 13.1% [interquartile range 13.6]; 24.6% [interquartile range 21.1]); with adjusted odds ratios for infarct size greater than the median (reference <1 mm): 1 to <2 mm, odds ratio 2.3 (95% confidence interval 0.8 to 5.9); > or = 2 mm, odds ratio 6.3 (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 23.7; c-index 0.781). In conclusion, an electrocardiogram obtained early after primary percutaneous coronary intervention analyzed by a simple algorithm provided prognostic information on the final infarct size and cardiac function.

Effect of intravenous FX06 as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction results of the F.I.R.E. (Efficacy of FX06 in the Prevention of Myocardial Reperfusion Injury) trial.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether FX06 would limit infarct size when given as an adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention. BACKGROUND: FX06, a naturally occurring peptide derived from human fibrin, has been shown to reduce myocardial infarct size in animal models by mitigating reperfusion injury. METHODS: In all, 234 patients presenting with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were randomized in 26 centers. FX06 or matching placebo was given as intravenous bolus at reperfusion. Infarct size was assessed 5 days after myocardial infarction by late gadolinium enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Secondary outcomes included size of necrotic core zone and microvascular obstruction at 5 days, infarct size at 4 months, left ventricular function, troponin I levels, and safety. RESULTS: There were no baseline differences between groups. On day 5, there was no significant difference in total late gadolinium enhanced zone in the FX06 group compared with placebo (reduction by 21%; p = 0.207). The necrotic core zone, however, was significantly reduced by 58% (median 1.77 g [interquartile range 0.0, 9.09 g] vs. 4.20 g [interquartile range 0.3, 9.93 g]; p < 0.025). There were no significant differences in troponin I levels (at 48 h, -17% in the FX06 group). After 4 months, there were no longer significant differences in scar size. There were numerically fewer serious cardiac events in the FX06-treated group, and no differences in adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In this proof-of-concept trial, FX06 reduced the necrotic core zone as one measure of infarct size on magnetic resonance imaging, while total late enhancement was not significantly different between groups. The drug appears safe and well tolerated. (Efficacy of FX06 in the Prevention of Myocardial Reperfusion Injury [F.I.R.E.]; NCT00326976).

Comparison of infarct size changes with delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and electrocardiogram QRS scoring during the 6 months after acutely reperfused myocardial infarction.

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging using the delayed contrast-enhanced (DE-MRI) method can be used for characterizing and quantifying myocardial infarction (MI). Electrocardiogram (ECG) score after the acute phase of MI can be used to estimate the portion of left ventricular myocardium that has infarcted. There are no comparison of serial changes on ECG and DE-MRI measuring infarct size. AIM: The general aim of this study was to describe the acute, healing, and chronic phases of the changes in infarct size estimated by the ECG and DE-MRI. The specific aim was to compare estimates of the Selvester QRS scoring system and DE-MRI to identify the difference between the extent of left ventricle occupied by infarction in the acute and chronic phases. METHODS: In 31 patients (26 men, age 56 +/- 9) with reperfused ST-elevation MI (11 anterior, 20 inferior), standard 12-lead ECG and DE-MRI were taken from 1 to 2 days (acute), 1 month (healing), and 6 months (chronic) after the MI. Selvester QRS scoring was used to estimate the infarct size from the ECG. RESULTS: The correlation values between infarct size measured by DE-MRI and QRS scoring range from 0.33 to 0.43 higher for anterior than inferior infarcts. The infarct size estimated by QRS scoring was larger (about 5% of the left ventricle) than infarct size by DE-MRI acute and 1 month, but at 6 months, there was no difference. In about half of the patients, the QRS score agreed with DE-MRI in change of infarct size from acute to 6 months. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the Selvester QRS scoring system is in half of the patients with reperfused first time MI in good accordance with DE-MRI in identifying a decrease or no change in the extent of left ventricle occupied by infarction in the acute and chronic phases.

The relative accuracies of ECG precordial lead waveforms derived from EASI leads and those acquired from paramedic applied standard leads.

Accurate precordial electrode placement can be difficult in emergency situations leading either to loss of time or diminished accuracy. A possible solution is the quasi-orthogonal EASI lead system, with only five electrodes and easily defined landmarks to provide a derived 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that precordial waveforms in EASI-derived ECGs have no greater deviation from those in gold standard ECGs, than do the precordial waveforms in paramedic acquired standard ECGs. Twenty paramedics applied the standard precordial electrodes employing the routine procedure. A certified ECG technician applied the 6 standard precordial electrodes in their correct gold standard positions, and the EASI electrodes. 12-lead ECGs were obtained from the paramedics' standard leads, and derived from the EASI leads, for comparison with the gold standard ECG. In each precordial lead recording, 6 computer-measured QRS-T waveform parameters were considered. Differences between deltaEASI-gold standard versus deltaparamedic-gold standard were calculated for every waveform in every lead resulting in 720 comparisons. EASI and paramedic results were "equally accurate" in 47%, the paramedic was more accurate in 31%, and EASI was more accurate in the remaining 22%. The differences from gold standard recording of precordial waveforms in ECGs derived from the EASI leads and those acquired via paramedic-applied standard electrodes are similar. The results suggest that the EASI lead system may provide an alternative to the standard ECG precordial leads to facilitate data acquisition and possibly save valuable time in emergency situations.